RFR: 8158670: Fix @modules in java/lang/SecurityManager/CheckSecurityProvider.java

[Alexandre (Shura) Iline]

Copyrights fixed in place.

Thank you, Mandy.

Shura

> On Jun 27, 2016, at 12:27 PM, Mandy Chung <mandy.chung at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> I’m including security-dev which would be a better list to review this test fix.
> 
> Valerie,
>   Does this test have to be order-sensitive?  I think this test would be cleaner to make it order-insensitive and simply test the security provider initialization.
> 
> See my comments below.
> 
>> On Jun 27, 2016, at 8:21 AM, Alexandre (Shura) Iline <alexandre.iline at oracle.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi.
>> 
>> Please take a look on a suggested for for the java/lang/SecurityManager/CheckSecurityProvider.java test. 
>> 
>> The test in question depend on a list of modules, some of them are platform-specific. Listing all the dependencies in one test is causing the test to be skipped on every platform. In an offline conversation it was decided that it is better to split this tests into a few tests to declare the per-platform module dependencies.
>> 
>> The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8158670
>> The suggested fix: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shurailine/8158670/webrev.00/
> 
> The copyright header start year of the new tests should be 2016.
> 
> I would suggest to make CheckSecurityProvide a platform-neutral test, i.e.,
> - drop @requires
> - make line 94-97 to ignore the platform-dependent provider if it’s present in the white list
> 
> If we could make this test order-insensitive, it’d be cleaner to maintain a platform-neutral list of security providers and one list for the platform-dependent security providers for each platform.  Just an idea.
> 
> Mandy
>