Project JIGSAW does not work

[Everson Ferreira da Cunha Junior]

Hi guys!

I found the solution for my problem. Maybe this information can be
important for other developer. If you desire to run JIGSAW project's
examples cod, so you need download open-jdk-9 with jigsaw project:
https://jdk9.java.net/jigsaw/. It appears obvious, but I didn't know.

Thank you.

On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Everson Ferreira da Cunha Junior <
everson.c.junior at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jon.
> What's recommend to do ? Do I need to find other version case it exists?
> I've read some information about this problem. It advice to add this
> project into jdk 9. Is it correct?
>
> Thanks guys!
> On May 16, 2016 11:45, "Jonathan Gibbons" <jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com>
> wrote:
>
>> In general, it's not practical to go back and fix updates to older
>> releases so that the compiler is cognisant of all syntax changes
>> in subsequent releases, especially changes in features that are
>> still under development.
>>
>> For example, it's possible that the original submitter was using
>> a recent version of javac, but just not recent enough. [1]
>> Should we have had forward looking error detection in early
>> builds of JDK 9 as well?
>>
>> The submitter provided very little information in his post, just
>> referring to a "example of guide on Ubuntu Linux'."  It would
>> make more sense to ensure that any such guides reference
>> the minimal JDK version and build required for the content they
>> contain.
>>
>> -- Jon
>>
>> [1]
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2016-March/003877.html
>>
>> On 05/15/2016 07:22 PM, Paul Benedict wrote:
>>
>>> It would be helpful in the next update to emit an error message specific
>>> to
>>> finding the "module" keyword and report it's only available in -source 9.
>>> That kind of little stuff can go a long way in helping users.
>>> On May 15, 2016 2:32 PM, "Alan Bateman" <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 15/05/2016 19:46, Remi Forax wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Everson,
>>>> let start with a simple question,
>>>> do you have checked that you use the java 9 version of javac (javac
>>>> -version) ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Right, the output looks like JDK 8 or older is being used.
>>>>
>>> -Alan.
>>>
>>
>>