New proposal for #ReflectiveAccessToNonExportedTypes: Open modules & open packages

[Gregg Wonderly]

I find this text much more demonstrative of the needs of the many.  Thanks for continuing to work through things with the community and understand needs that we all have for a good path forward which allows everyone to use JDK9 and for the future to hold a much better view of encapsulation without the pain of needing to unscrew the whole framework to get to details that are vital today.

Gregg

> On Oct 27, 2016, at 11:07 AM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> 
> Thanks to everyone who commented on the weak-modules proposal.  I've
> just posted a third proposal for #ReflectiveAccessToNonExportedTypes,
> along with an analysis of the proposals presented thus far:
> 
>  http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jpms-spec-experts/2016-October/000430.html
>  http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jpms-spec-experts/2016-October/000431.html
> 
> Further comments most welcome, as usual!
> 
> - Mark