8177530: Module system implementation refresh (4/2017)

[Kevin Rushforth]

FX build for jdk9+164 already was promoted last Friday. The changeset to 
use that build was pushed to jdk9/dev on Saturday (as per usual), but 
probably wasn't synced down to jdk9/jake.

-- Kevin


Mandy Chung wrote:
> FXLauncherTest.java should fail until FX change [1] is integrated and promoted (target for jdk-9+164).  I suggest to rerun the test after jdk-9+164 is promoted and sync down to jdk9/dev and jake.
>
> Mandy
> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177751
>
>
>   
>> On Apr 5, 2017, at 7:35 PM, Amy Lu <amy.lu at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Alan
>>
>> I noticed test tools/launcher/FXLauncherTest.java fails with jigsaw-nightly-h6277-20170404 (on Windows platform). Is that because related OpenJFX changes are not yet in the mentioned build?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Amy
>>
>> On 4/5/17 12:28 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>     
>>> As I mentioned on jigsaw-dev yesterday, we have accumulated a number of changes in the jake forest and would like to bring the changes into jdk9/dev for jdk-9+165.
>>>
>>> Most of the changes in this update are the move of Module and friends from java.lang.reflect to java.lang. This is mostly a mechanical update.
>>>
>>> We also have the update to the derivation of automatic modules to no longer ignore trailing digits in modules names, this is to align JDK 9 with the updated proposal for issue #VersionsInModuleNames [1].
>>>
>>> There are a number of smaller changes, summarized in JDK-8177530 [2].
>>>
>>> The webrev with the changes is here:
>>>  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alanb/8177530/1
>>>
>>> The changes are currently based on jdk-9+163 and will be rebased before pushing to jdk9/dev.
>>>
>>> The corresponding update to jtreg is already in the code-tools/jtreg repo and will be tagged (I assume as jtreg4.2-b07) before this integration. Once it is tagged then we'll rev'ing the requiredVersion in each TEST.ROOT.
>>>
>>> -Alan
>>>
>>> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/spec/issues/#VersionsInModuleNames
>>> [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177530
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>
>