Sync with jdk9 and ASM alpha 2

[Roman Shevchenko]

Hi,

are there any pending changes to the class file format? Looking forward to the Alpha 2 release :)


> On 11 Dec 2016, at 17:21, Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> On 11/12/2016 13:05, Remi Forax wrote:
> 
>> Hi Alan,
>> if i get it right, the jdk9 b148 (not the jigsaw version) get a refresh of module-info classfile format but did not get the last two changes,
>> version of requires and the two new constant pool entries.
>> Do you plan to push these changes in the jdk9 workspace soon so i will delay the release of ASM 6 alpha 2 or do you plan to introduce these changes later so i should release an alpha 2 now and release an alpha 3/beta later ?
>> 
>> 
> That's right. We are going to aim for jdk-9+150 to get the latest proposals integrated.
> 
> -Alan