Javadoc vs Accessibility

[Jonathan Gibbons]

Sorry, cut and paste error; the second occurrence should have been -private.


     -public
           --show-module-contents api --show-packages exported 
--show-types public --show-members public

     -protected   (the long-standing default)
           --show-module-contents api --show-packages exported 
--show-types protected --show-members protected

     -package
           --show-module-contents all --show-packages all --show-types 
package --show-members package

     -private
           --show-module-contents all --show-packages all --show-types 
private --show-members private


-- Jon


On 01/31/2017 01:45 AM, Andrew Dinn wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> On 31/01/17 00:05, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>
>>  From the command-line help, the relevant new options are the following:
>> . . .
>> The good news is that you can use the existing simple options, which are
>> now
>> internally defined in terms of those new options
>>
>>      -public
>>            --show-module-contents api --show-packages exported
>> --show-types public --show-members public
>>
>>      -protected   (the long-standing default)
>>            --show-module-contents api --show-packages exported
>> --show-types protected --show-members protected
>>
>>      -package
>>            --show-module-contents all --show-packages all --show-types
>> package --show-members package
>>
>>      -public
>>            --show-module-contents all --show-packages all --show-types
>> private --show-members private
> Option -public attracts the glory of double billing yet corresponding
> onus of double duty in the above help text -- which cannot be right.
>
> Could you provide corrected details of the intended command line options
> for the cases that have been elided?
>
> regards,
>
>
> Andrew Dinn
> -----------
> Senior Principal Software Engineer
> Red Hat UK Ltd
> Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903
> Directors: Michael Cunningham, Michael ("Mike") O'Neill, Eric Shander