Incompatible change to java.lang.instrument.Instrumentation
Alan Bateman
Alan.Bateman at oracle.com
Fri Jun 16 06:11:49 UTC 2017
On 16/06/2017 06:54, Sven Reimers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as part of the process of the code donation from Oracle to Apache for
> NetBeans I tried a compilation of the source code using idk 9-ea+173. The
> compilation fails due to an added method boolean isModifiableModule(Module)
> in java.lang.instrument.Instrumentation.
>
> Should the newly added method on the interface Instrumentation have a
> default implementation to make this change source code compatible from 8 to
> 9, e.g.
>
> default boolean isModifiableModule(Module module) {
>
> return false;
>
> }
>
>
> Is it already to late for changing this before JDK 9 release?
>
You are correct that adding abstract methods to Instrumentation is an
incompatible change but the long term assumption in this area has always
been it wouldn't be implemented outside of the java.instrument module.
There were 4 abstract methods added to it in Java SE 6 and I don't
recall anyone screaming (pre-dates default methods of course).
So can you say what NetBeans is doing? Is this mocking, maybe
forwarding/intercepting? If there is a compelling reasons then we could
try to see about changing redefineModule and the other new methods to be
default methods but it is late and there is more to this that changing
them to be default methods.
-Alan
More information about the jigsaw-dev
mailing list