[9] Review request: 8177566: FX user module gets IllegalAccessException from sun.reflect.misc.Trampoline

Mandy Chung mandy.chung at oracle.com
Tue May 2 21:45:46 UTC 2017


> On May 2, 2017, at 2:22 PM, Kevin Rushforth <kevin.rushforth at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Here is the message:
> 
> IllegalAccessException: class com.sun.javafx.property.MethodHelper cannot access class com.foo (in module foo.app) because module foo.app does not open com.foo to javafx.base 
> 

It would be better to emit a more informative message e.g. “javafx.base cannot access class com.foo (in module foo.app).  Either exports com.foo unqualifiedly or open com.foo to javafx.base”.  Also in MethodUtil::invoke
  61            if (!module.isExported(packageName)) {
You can do this check only if module.isNamed.

> It is roughly the same message that any similar illegal access would generate (e.g., we get similar error messages when FXML tries to call setAccessible for a field annotated with @FXML if the module is not "open" to javafx.fxml).
> 
>> javafx.base/src/main/java/com/sun/javafx/property/MethodHelper.java
>> javafx.fxml/src/main/java/com/sun/javafx/fxml/MethodHelper.java
>> javafx.web/src/main/java/com/sun/webkit/MethodHelper.java
>>   45     public static Object invoke(Method m, Object obj, Object[] params)
>> 
>> To avoid 3 ModuleHelper classes, the invoke method can take
>> the callerModule argument to replace this line: 
>>   56         final Module thisModule = MethodHelper.class.getModule();
>>   
> 
> I'm fairly certain that won't work. Module::addOpens is caller sensitive and will only work when called from the module in question.
> 

You are right.  Wont’t work.
>> javafx.base/src/main/java/com/sun/javafx/reflect/MethodUtil.java
>>   There are a few other public methods which I think JavaFX doesn’t
>>   need and can be removed.
>>   
> 
> Yes, I could do this to reduce the public footprint of the class. To minimize the diffs between the original and our copy, I might just comment out the "public". That would also make it easier to add them back in a future version (e.g., to eventually get rid of all dependency on sun.reflect.misc). Thoughts?

I will leave it up to you.
Mandy



More information about the jigsaw-dev mailing list