Regression in getImplementationVersion from Jigsaw
mandy chung
mandy.chung at oracle.com
Thu Nov 9 03:07:57 UTC 2017
FYI.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk10/webrevs/8190987/webrev.00/index.html
While the line width is not consistent across all source files, we try
to keep 80-column width as the coding convention.
Mandy
On 11/8/17 6:25 PM, Michael D wrote:
> Hi Mandy,
>
> No problem. Wasn't sure where the limit was on line lengths, so I will
> watch and learn :)
>
> Thanks
> Michael
>
> On 9 November 2017 at 13:22, mandy chung <mandy.chung at oracle.com> wrote:
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> It is indeed a bug and I file:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8190987
>>
>> The patch looks good and I will sponsor this patch for you.
>>
>> Thanks for the regression test. It'd be good to wrap the long lines and I
>> will clean that up before I push.
>>
>> thanks
>> Mandy
>>
>> On 11/8/17 5:07 PM, Michael D wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Hope I'm in the right place.
>>> The implementation of Jigsaw caused a regression in that
>>> Package.getImplementationVersion is unusable if no other version
>>> things are defined in the manifest.
>>> This appears to be an unintentional regression caused by a missing null
>>> check.
>>> I have prepared a patch and unit test for review here:
>>> https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/md-5/OpenJDK/pull/3.patch
>>> Note that only testImplVersion fails, but I have included tests for
>>> all the version elements for completeness.
>>>
>>> NB: Not an OpenJDK dev so can't create webrev or bug report.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Michael
>>
More information about the jigsaw-dev
mailing list