java.lang.annotation.Generated
Stephen Colebourne
scolebourne at joda.org
Wed Sep 20 13:04:50 UTC 2017
And just noting that the thread in March did not call out the fact
that the webrev did not correspond to the original agreed change from
Mark/jigsaw-dev. The only way you'd have spotted the package was
javax.annotation.processing and not java.lang.annotation is by
clicking on the webrev itself. Sorry, but I'm not impressed by this.
Stephen
On 20 September 2017 at 13:58, Stephen Colebourne <scolebourne at joda.org> wrote:
> Ouch. Thats an unpleasant result. It should have gone in `java.lang.annotation`.
> Stephen
>
> On 20 September 2017 at 13:49, Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com> wrote:
>> On 20/09/2017 13:43, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>>>
>>> As per this email:
>>>
>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2017-February/011365.html
>>> the idea was to add a new annotation `java.lang.annotation.Generated`
>>> to replace the old problematic one.
>>>
>>> Is it my imagination, or did this get forgotten?:
>>>
>>
>> The discussion/review moved to core-libs-dev and compiler-dev in March, here
>> it is:
>>
>> http://download.java.net/java/jdk9/docs/api/javax/annotation/processing/Generated.html
More information about the jigsaw-dev
mailing list