Reflection: how does one access a protected member in a superclass reflectively?

[Rony G. Flatscher]

Hi,

On 22.01.2018 16:24, Roger Riggs wrote:
> Contributions need to be submitted using the OpenJDK infrastructure to adhere to the IP requirements.
Would you have a link which OpenJFDK infrastructure to use in this case?

> The mail lists shold pass attachments that are text and patches though you may need to be
> sure your mailer attaches them with the correct mime-types and/or extensions.
>
> Roger
>
> p.s.
> The current settings have pass_mime_types:
>
>    multipart/mixed
>    multipart/alternative
>    text/plain
>    text/x-diff
>    text/x-patch
>    message/rfc822
>    multipart/signed
Thanks for this information!

Regards,

---rony

> On 1/22/2018 10:18 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>> On 19.01.2018 15:38, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> On 18/01/2018 15:07, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>>>> An attachment in the email has been found to contain executable code and has been removed.
>>>>
>>>> File removed : java9modules.zip, zip,cmd
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dear Alan:
>>>>
>>>> tried to come up with a "cleaner" version to zip it up, however the error would not occur there.
>>> The attachment was dropped too.
>> OK, next time, I will use Dropbox or the like instead.
> Sorry, only inline, attached or on cr.openjdk.java.net.
>