RFR (T): 8242846: Bring back test/jdk/tools/jlink/plugins/OrderResourcesPluginTest.java

Ao Qi aoqi at loongson.cn
Mon Apr 27 11:02:38 UTC 2020


Thank you, Sundar.

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 6:49 PM <sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Looks good. I'll sponsor this fix.
>
> Thanks
>
> -Sundar
>
> On 27/04/20 4:15 pm, Ao Qi wrote:
> > Thanks, Sundar!
> >
> > I updated a new webrev (patch is the same, only hg commit info was
> > added): http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aoqi/8242846/webrev.02/
> >
> > Could someone help to sponsor this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ao Qi
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:52 PM <sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com> wrote:
> >> Looks good
> >>
> >> -Sundar
> >>
> >> On 27/04/20 12:24 pm, Ao Qi wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 12:00 AM Alan Bateman <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 21/04/2020 04:58, Ao Qi wrote:
> >>>>> On 2020/4/20 下午9:27, Alan Bateman wrote:
> >>>>>> On 20/04/2020 11:32, sundararajan.athijegannathan at oracle.com wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi Alan,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I don't remember it now. Likely a mistake. The changeset
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/a066fe7b1b42
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> has that file. Perhaps it may be useful to restore & check if the
> >>>>>>> test passes.
> >>>>>> Yes. I think it was the only test for this jlink option so let's
> >>>>>> bring it back or replace it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> I think the test should be brought back. I restored the test and it
> >>>>> didn't pass. Here is the diff against the original test[1]:
> >>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aoqi/8242846/diff.01, and the new webrev
> >>>>> is http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aoqi/8242846/webrev.01/ . I'm not
> >>>>> familiar with this field, so I am not sure I fix this rightly.
> >>>> Thanks, I think this looks okay.
> >>> Thanks, Alan. I have updated the bug title. Is another review needed?
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Ao Qi
> >>>
> >>>> -Alan.



More information about the jigsaw-dev mailing list