Modules with platform specific parts

Johan Vos johan.vos at gluonhq.com
Mon Sep 27 08:38:03 UTC 2021


I'd be happy to see Google joining the discussion, but Android (as in the
Java "clone")  is totally unrelated to OpenJDK so I think it is unlikely to
see relevant input from that side.
However, OpenJDK works great on Android-devices (and can be used to create
Android apps and upload them to stores), so *developers* targeting those
devices are covered.

What I hope to accomplish is to first of all get a discussion about the
potential options for developers dealing with platform-specific (native and
Java) code. It would be great if there was support at the specification
level for this best-practice, but that is probably something for the longer
term, as it will require more resources and lots of analysis, to make sure
backward compatibility is not broken.

- Johan

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 12:52 PM Samuel Audet <samuel.audet at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I certainly hope so! But I don't see anyone, for example, from Google
> representing Android, so what do we hope to accomplish, exactly? Let's
> start by making the goals clear.
>
> Samuel
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021, 16:35 Johan Vos <johan.vos at gluonhq.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 2:55 AM Samuel Audet <samuel.audet at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> If it wants to remain relevant, OpenJDK should really consider having a
>>> broader discussion about this.
>>>
>> ...
>>
>>> Please, please, do consider fixing the JDK instead of talking about
>>> coming up with incompatible "solutions"!
>>>
>>
>> I totally agree, but I believe this is exactly what we are doing now?
>>
>> - Johan
>>
>


More information about the jigsaw-dev mailing list