`requires static` versus service binding

[Alan Bateman]

On 10/01/2025 17:21, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> :
>
> I understand that this is not a very common problem or a high-priority 
> issue, and I would have accepted that it was down-prioritized to the 
> point that it will take a long time to resolve, but the current "works 
> as intended" approach is still a bit hard for me to swallow.
>
>
`requires static` was added to support annotations that aren't needed at 
runtime, and also some configuration cases. I don't think support for 
optional service interfaces has been ruled out but it's more complex to 
specify that it might appear.

-Alan