The names of example's classes. Small "Java Language Specification" improvement.

[Dmitri Cerkas]

 Hello JLS Team,

maybe I allow myself too much, but don't you think that name "Test" of classes in the examples of JLS is not quite appropriate for the context and for the content they (examples) have? 
Name "Test" is more for "Functional Testing" ("UnitTesting", ecc), "Non-Functional Testing", ecc, with assertions and special libraries for test software...
Maybe its more appropriate "Explanation" as the name of classes in the examples of JLS?
Thank you very much and sorry for disturbing!Have a nice day,Dmitri.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/jls-jvms-spec-comments/attachments/20220615/acaaa74c/attachment.htm>