Review request: JMC-6072: Incorrect artifactId for snapshot build

[Guru]

> On 13-Aug-2018, at 7:02 PM, Marcus Hirt <marcus.hirt at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Guru,
> 
> I think the last one was meant to be:
> org.openjdk.jmc.flightrecorder.rules.jdk (old) — jmc.flightrecorder.rules.jdk
> 
> Right?
Yes, Marcus you are right,
> 
> Kind regards,
> Marcus
> 
> From: Guru <guru.hb at oracle.com>
> Date: Monday, 13 August 2018 at 15:10
> To: <jmc-dev at openjdk.java.net>, Marcus Hirt <marcus.hirt at oracle.com>
> Cc: Jayathirth D V <jayathirth.d.v at oracle.com>, Sharath Ballal <sharath.ballal at oracle.com>
> Subject: Review request: JMC-6072: Incorrect artifactId for snapshot build
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Please review the fix for : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JMC-6072 
> webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ghb/JMC-6072/webrev.0/ 
> RC and solution is updated in JBS.
> 
> With this fix the core artifactID will be with group id : “org.openjdk.jmc” (as it was earlier) and artifactId (from maven point of view and Bundle-SymbolicName from Tyco point of view) name will be 
> artifactId(old)  —— artifactdId(new)
> org.openjdk.jmc.common (old) — jmc.common
> org.openjdk.jmc.flightrecorder (old) — jmc.flightrecorder 
> org.openjdk.jmc.flightrecorder.rules (old) — jmc.flightrecorder.rules
> org.openjdk.jmc.flightrecorder.rules.jdk (old) — jmc.common.flightrecorder.rules.jdk
> 
> For naming convention Please update your views on http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jmc-dev/2018-August/000155.html 
> 
> Thanks,
> Guru
> 
> 
> 
> 
>