Thoughts on code reviews.
Sharath Ballal
sharath.ballal at oracle.com
Fri Sep 7 03:52:05 UTC 2018
+1 Marcus.
Thanks,
Sharath
-----Original Message-----
From: Marcus Hirt
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2018 4:16 AM
To: jmc-dev at openjdk.java.net
Subject: Thoughts on code reviews.
Importance: High
Hi all,
The JMC project does not formally require code reviews, in the OpenJDK bylaws sense of the term. That said, we still have the notion of reviewers, and each check-in must have been reviewed by someone else. We only have one active reviewer on the project today (me), and this has proven quite limiting.
I am suggesting that we do three things:
1. We appoint Guru reviewer. Especially for all things infrastructure and
release engineering, a review by Guru is enough to push.
2. We appoint Miro author (has two sponsored commits).
3. Two authors together (with experience in the area of the code) can together
perform a review. At least for the foreseeable future. (Continuing the
summer's temporary policy.)
What do you think?
Kind regards,
Marcus
More information about the jmc-dev
mailing list