RFR: 6631: Updating version to 8.0.0
    Henrik Dafg=?UTF-8?B?w6U=?=rd 
    github.com+513271+Gunde at openjdk.org
       
    Thu Nov 14 19:46:24 UTC 2019
    
    
  
On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:43:03 GMT, Marcus Hirt <hirt at openjdk.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:35:04 GMT, Marcus Hirt <hirt at openjdk.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:14:27 GMT, Alex Macdonald <aptmac at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 13:54:24 GMT, Marcus Hirt <hirt at openjdk.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> This patch updates the version to 8.0.0.
>>>> 
>>>> ----------------
>>>> 
>>>> Commits:
>>>>  - ffd61fd7: Updating to 8.0.0
>>>>  - 837906dc: Updating to 8.0.0
>>>> 
>>>> Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jmc/pull/1/files
>>>>  Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/jmc/1/webrev.00
>>>>   Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JMC-6631
>>>>   Stats: 376 lines in 289 files changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 376 mod
>>>>   Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jmc/pull/1.diff
>>>>   Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jmc pull/1/head:pull/1
>>> 
>>> Also, should these commits be folded into each other because they're working to accomplish the same goal? Or will they be squashed when merged?
>>> 
>>> application/org.openjdk.jmc.updatesite.ide/src/main/resources/update-site-instructions/index.html line 79:
>>> 
>>>> 78:                     <p>Fill in the following URL in the <b>Work with:</b> text field:</p>
>>>> 79:                     	<p><b>https://download.oracle.com/technology/products/missioncontrol/updatesites/openjdk/8.0.0/eclipse/</b></p>
>>>> 80:                     	<p>Press the return key.</p>
>>> 
>>> My terminal is showing new empty spaces on this line .. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> It seems to be because there's a tab just before the `<p>`, but up until that point it's single spaces.
>>> 
>>> ----------------
>>> 
>>> Changes requested by aptmac (Committer).
>> 
>> Funny, the following line also had a tab. Given the standard indentation of the project, they should all be tabs, but they got to be spaced for now.
>> 
>> We should add spotless...
> 
> @Gunde - okay if I integrate this, even though there will be a review missing on record (since you're not properly hooked up yet)?
> @Gunde - okay if I integrate this, even though there will be a review missing on record (since you're not properly hooked up yet)?
Go ahead!
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jmc/pull/1
    
    
More information about the jmc-dev
mailing list