RFR: 7194 : No local JVMs found message could be more helpful

[Marcus Hirt]

On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 17:09:45 GMT, Michael S. <github.com+29914148+docwarems at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Feel free to update the JMC-included documentation if you feel it improves it. :) The project itself mostly concerns itself with the included documentation, not the Oracle-hosted FAQ.
>
> OK, IMO we have this situation:
> 
> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/jmc/JMC+FAQ (last updated 02/2020) is the location for publishing the FAQ currently and in the future. It's a Confluence system, and there's no way to sync this with a Git document, because Confluence has it's own versioning.
> That means the purpose of the repo FAQ (last update 01/2019) could be not more than for saving the raw content (the HTML format is only used for better reading, otherwise it could be even plain text).
> 
> Is my view correct?
> 
> To me the published FAQ looks much more useful than the repo FAQ. If you ask me, I would replace the repo with the content from the published FAQ, and add the answer from this PR.
> 
> At least we have the content of both in sync then.

Does this render OK in the help browser?

1. Start JMC.
2. Go to Help | JDK Mission Control Help.
3. Click Frequently Asked Questions (at the bottom of the TOC).

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jmc/pull/232