RFR: 8406: Chinese Rule strings are out of date

[Alex Macdonald]

On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 01:55:39 GMT, Huang Xiao <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Originally reported in [https://github.com/adoptium/jmc-build/issues/102#issuecomment-3017636147](https://github.com/adoptium/jmc-build/issues/102#issuecomment-3017636147).
> 
> The corresponding synchronization has been performed based on "[https://github.com/openjdk/jmc/blob/master/core/org.openjdk.jmc.flightrecorder.rules.jdk/src/main/resources/org/openjdk/jmc/flightrecorder/rules/jdk/messages/internal/messages.properties](https://github.com/openjdk/jmc/blob/master/core/org.openjdk.jmc.flightrecorder.rules.jdk/src/main/resources/org/openjdk/jmc/flightrecorder/rules/jdk/messages/internal/messages.properties)", but the source file "messages.properties" also contains cases where parameters have not been replaced. This may require your attention.
> 
> ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/238e991f-99b4-48df-bd4c-43db71a22f30)
> 
> Additionally, I have found that there exist other documents that are in dire need of translation as well, and I would follow up by suggesting that these things could be handled with some AI tools.

@youngledo Thanks for the PR! Just a couple of housekeeping items:

- I had opened a ticket for this issue (https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JMC-8406), if you could change the title of this PR to "8406: Chinese Rule strings are out of date" it will satisfy one of the jcheck requirements

- Contributing to JMC requires completion of the Oracle Contributor Agreement, please follow the instructions listed in this automatic comment from the openjdk bot: https://github.com/openjdk/jmc/pull/662#issuecomment-3047095278

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jmc/pull/662#issuecomment-3049067483