RFR: 8406: Chinese Rule strings are out of date [v3]

[duke]

On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 03:41:49 GMT, Huang Xiao <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Originally reported in [https://github.com/adoptium/jmc-build/issues/102#issuecomment-3017636147](https://github.com/adoptium/jmc-build/issues/102#issuecomment-3017636147).
>> 
>> The corresponding synchronization has been performed based on "[https://github.com/openjdk/jmc/blob/master/core/org.openjdk.jmc.flightrecorder.rules.jdk/src/main/resources/org/openjdk/jmc/flightrecorder/rules/jdk/messages/internal/messages.properties](https://github.com/openjdk/jmc/blob/master/core/org.openjdk.jmc.flightrecorder.rules.jdk/src/main/resources/org/openjdk/jmc/flightrecorder/rules/jdk/messages/internal/messages.properties)", but the source file "messages.properties" also contains cases where parameters have not been replaced. This may require your attention.
>> 
>> ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/238e991f-99b4-48df-bd4c-43db71a22f30)
>> 
>> Additionally, I have found that there exist other documents that are in dire need of translation as well, and I would follow up by suggesting that these things could be handled with some AI tools.
>
> Huang Xiao has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains three additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'openjdk:master' into L10N
>  - trigger CI
>  - Update L10N translation for JMC.

@youngledo 
Your change (at version 46bf609ae23dc4e826a1d54e4f97d9cdbf64c9ad) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jmc/pull/662#issuecomment-3226366594