Feature/Opinion request

[Aleksey Shipilev]

On 04/30/2013 04:22 PM, Nitsan Wakart wrote:
> Your opinion on further details required for peer review
> + thoughts on potential for common format, means of achieving same
> goal by other means?

Yes, this is something running in the back of our minds as well. Some
human/machine readable format for exchanging the experiment data.

This have a couple of caveats though:
 a) we need to think about the format evolution from day 1; most of the
internal formats were doomed to fail lacking that.
 b) we need to provide essential bindings to provide the APIs to
generate, parse, render these formats.

Both these tasks are connected with JMH, but I suspect they are deserve
to be the project in the own right. Which makes me thinking if we
already have the format like this somewhere?

-Aleksey.