specializing jvmArgs in a derived class
Aleksey Shipilev
aleksey.shipilev at oracle.com
Fri Aug 22 20:12:09 UTC 2014
On 08/23/2014 12:05 AM, Deneau, Tom wrote:
> I see your point about making @Benchmark be in the derived classes.
> I only did it the other way because 90% of the time, it doesn't need to be overridden with anything.
> But perhaps some restructuring would be better...
Understood. Well, since the JMH parameters are resolved through the
inheritance hierarchy [1], it might be fruitful to just introduce the
intermediary class, a la:
@Fork(jvmArgs = ...)
class MyCustomSharedSettings {
}
class OverridenSettingsBenchmark extends MyCustomSharedSettings {
@Benchmark
public void bench() {
}
}
class JustABenchmark {
@Benchmark
public void bench() {
}
}
Thanks,
-Aleksey.
[1]
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jmh/file/tip/jmh-samples/src/main/java/org/openjdk/jmh/samples/JMHSample_24_Inheritance.java
More information about the jmh-dev
mailing list