Blackhole.consume(Object) has different semantics to Blackhole.consume(primitive)

[Aleksey Shipilev]

On 11/12/2014 04:34 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> On 11/12/2014 04:31 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> On 11/12/2014 03:49 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>>> If you are concerned with the absence of volatile reads for reference
>>> consumes, we may add the volatile "spoiler" there to get the same
>>> effect. That will break the perceived consistency from ARM case -- seems
>>> to be the lesser evil.
>>
>> Filed:
>>  https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/CODETOOLS-7901095
> 
> Would that be a solution you are looking for, Nitsan?
>  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/7901095/webrev.01/

Update:
 http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/7901095/webrev.02/

-Aleksey.