Question about exception I am seeing after upgrading to jmh 1.15

[Aleksey Shipilev]

On 10/07/2016 02:24 PM, Zoltan Farkas wrote:
> From what I understand, I believe JMH should probably take control of
> the thread lifecycle and not rely on executors.

Yeah, well... there are cases where you *want* to make sure JMH threads
are coming from a given executor. If your case is not one of them, then
you will not suffer from JMH using whatever executor it thinks is okay.

Thanks,
-Aleksey