Comparing performance of JDK List Implementations

[Bruce Eckel]

I thought I was following the pattern I found on
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jmh/file/d0821c7627fb/jmh-samples/src/main/java/org/openjdk/jmh/samples/JMHSample_26_BatchSize.java
with "measureRight()"


-- Bruce Eckel
www.MindviewInc.com <http://www.mindviewinc.com/>
Blog: BruceEckel.github.io
www.WinterTechForum.com
www.AtomicScala.com
www.Reinventing-Business.com
http://www.TrustOrganizations.com <http://www.ScalaSummit.com>


On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Henri Tremblay <henri.tremblay at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Quick question: Why are you using a BlackHole for get and returning a
> value for all the others?
>
>
> On 21 October 2016 at 17:16, Bruce Eckel <bruceteckel at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Attached is my current version which compares List implementations. I plan
>> to do this for the other basic collection types (Set, Map, Queue,
>> Dequeue),
>> but would like some feedback on this one. Thanks.
>>
>>
>>
>> -- Bruce Eckel
>> www.MindviewInc.com <http://www.mindviewinc.com/>
>> Blog: BruceEckel.github.io
>> www.WinterTechForum.com
>> www.AtomicScala.com
>> www.Reinventing-Business.com
>> http://www.TrustOrganizations.com <http://www.ScalaSummit.com>
>>
>
>