DTrace asm profiler for Mac OS X

Henri Tremblay henri.tremblay at gmail.com
Wed Dec 27 14:56:34 UTC 2017


No. One was Linux (perf), the other was OSX (dtrace). Let me put the
benchmark out.

On 26 December 2017 at 14:19, Vsevolod Tolstopyatov <qwwdfsad at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi, could you share your benchmark?
> I've just re-applied my patch over clean repo and
> run JMHSample_37_CacheAccess with dtrace-profiler, everything works as
> expected, so maybe your hottest region lies in kernel code.
>
> >With perf, I would get some content. With dtrace, nothing.
> Are you running both on Linux?
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Tolstopyatov Vsevolod
>
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Henri Tremblay <henri.tremblay at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> A bit late but my only problem right now is that I don't get any hot
>> section. Which is weird.
>>
>> With perf, I would get some content. With dtrace, nothing.
>>
>> However, I am not an expert in using both. So maybe some javac or java
>> arguments are required to get nice results. Is it the case?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Henri
>>
>> On 23 November 2017 at 13:04, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/23/2017 09:09 AM, Vsevolod Tolstopyatov wrote:
>>> > Hello,
>>> >
>>> > Any news about this patch? Is it going into jmh?
>>>
>>> It will. Just let me figure out some Mac testing.
>>>
>>> -Aleksey
>>>
>>>
>>
>


More information about the jmh-dev mailing list