RFR: CODETOOLS-7902829: JMH Statistics implementations do not follow Comparable spec [v3]

Aleksey Shipilev shade at openjdk.java.net
Thu Feb 18 13:18:08 UTC 2021


On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 12:56:08 GMT, Vladimir Sitnikov <github.com+213894+vlsi at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Aleksey Shipilev has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Use Double.compare instead
>
> jmh-core/src/test/java/org/openjdk/jmh/util/TestListStatistics.java line 190:
> 
>> 188:         for (double conf : new double[] {0.5, 0.9, 0.99, 0.999, 0.9999, 0.99999}) {
>> 189:             Assert.assertTrue("Diff significant at " + conf, s1.isDifferent(s2, conf));
>> 190:             Assert.assertEquals(-1, s1.compareTo(s2, conf));
> 
> Technically speaking, the assert should be `less than 0` rather than `equal to -1`.
> `-2` is a valid result of `compareTo` call.
> 
> WDYT?

You need to press the checkbox in the comment to let me see the comment. But I guess what it says...

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jmh/pull/21


More information about the jmh-dev mailing list