RFR: 7903596: JMH: Explicitly enable annotation processors [v4]

Aleksey Shipilev shade at openjdk.org
Fri Dec 6 09:08:55 UTC 2024


On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 07:06:30 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <jpai at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Can I please get a review of this change which proposes to address the issue noted in https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/CODETOOLS-7903596?
>> 
>> As noted in that issue, when a benchmark generated using Java 22 is run, at runtime it fails with:
>> 
>> 
>> java -jar target/benchmarks.jar
>> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: ERROR: Unable to find the resource: /META-INF/BenchmarkList
>> 	at org.openjdk.jmh.runner.AbstractResourceReader.getReaders(AbstractResourceReader.java:98)
>> 	at org.openjdk.jmh.runner.BenchmarkList.find(BenchmarkList.java:124)
>> 	at org.openjdk.jmh.runner.Runner.internalRun(Runner.java:252)
>> 	at org.openjdk.jmh.runner.Runner.run(Runner.java:208)
>> 	at org.openjdk.jmh.Main.main(Main.java:71)
>> 
>> 
>> This is due to annotation processors being disabled by default during compilation starting Java 22. The commit in this PR, explicitly enables the `org.openjdk.jmh.generators.BenchmarkProcessor` annotation processor to allow for it to generate the necessary benchmark resources.
>> 
>> I've tested this change locally, with Java 8, Java 21 as well as Java 22 and the newly generated benchmark is now functional on all these versions.
>
> Jaikiran Pai has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains five additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - replace compilerArgs with annotationProcessors in maven-compiler-plugin
>  - merge latest from master branch
>  - Contributed-by Aleksey: Explicitly apply the annotation processor
>  - merge latest from master branch
>  - 7903596: jmh-java-benchmark-archetype generated benchmark fails at runtime - ERROR: Unable to find the resource: /META-INF/BenchmarkList

I think MacOS test failure is ignorable.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jmh/pull/125#issuecomment-2522582050


More information about the jmh-dev mailing list