RFR: 7903912: JMH: Pad using a mix of bytes and longs

[Aleksey Shipilev]

On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 15:19:19 GMT, Claes Redestad <redestad at openjdk.org> wrote:

> Indeed. What else do you think is necessary to build confidence in this change?

I am building out a formal argument why JDK layouters do not need more than a handful of bytes to cover the superclass gaps. Until then, I am not 100%, only 99.9% sure this change is safe. :)

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jmh/pull/147#issuecomment-2551743586