From ecaspole at openjdk.org Mon Dec 12 19:18:29 2022 From: ecaspole at openjdk.org (Eric Caspole) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 19:18:29 GMT Subject: RFR: Update to jmh 1.36 Message-ID: Time to upgrade the JMH. Among the other benefits I know that perfasm works better on aarch64. ------------- Commit messages: - Merge branch 'master' into update-to-jmh-1.36 - Update to JMH 1.36 Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks/pull/13/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks&pr=13&range=00 Stats: 5 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 4 del; 1 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks/pull/13.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks pull/13/head:pull/13 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks/pull/13 From ecaspole at openjdk.org Mon Dec 12 19:35:39 2022 From: ecaspole at openjdk.org (Eric Caspole) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 19:35:39 GMT Subject: RFR: Update to jmh 1.36 [v2] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > Time to upgrade the JMH. Among the other benefits I know that perfasm works better on aarch64. Eric Caspole has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: Missed a couple ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks/pull/13/files - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks/pull/13/files/4a208339..e7d227e8 Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks&pr=13&range=01 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks&pr=13&range=00-01 Stats: 8 lines in 2 files changed: 0 ins; 8 del; 0 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks/pull/13.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks pull/13/head:pull/13 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks/pull/13 From redestad at openjdk.org Tue Dec 13 16:09:25 2022 From: redestad at openjdk.org (Claes Redestad) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:09:25 GMT Subject: RFR: Update to jmh 1.36 [v2] In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 19:35:39 GMT, Eric Caspole wrote: >> Time to upgrade the JMH. Among the other benefits I know that perfasm works better on aarch64. > > Eric Caspole has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: > > Missed a couple Marked as reviewed by redestad (no project role). ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks/pull/13 From duke at openjdk.org Tue Dec 13 16:34:55 2022 From: duke at openjdk.org (duke) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:34:55 GMT Subject: git: openjdk/jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks: Update to jmh 1.36 (#13) Message-ID: <2b885563-12ed-4c50-aed0-806c6778ec14@openjdk.org> Changeset: 670934ee Author: Eric Caspole Committer: GitHub Date: 2022-12-13 11:31:34 +0000 URL: https://git.openjdk.org/jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks/commit/670934ee0922c1db23eb57f9d8ec90cff2ff1b4f Update to jmh 1.36 (#13) * Update to JMH 1.36 * Missed a couple ! micros-jdk11/pom.xml ! micros-jdk8/pom.xml ! micros-jdk9/pom.xml ! pom.xml From ecaspole at openjdk.org Tue Dec 13 16:35:32 2022 From: ecaspole at openjdk.org (Eric Caspole) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:35:32 GMT Subject: Withdrawn: Update to jmh 1.36 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0Jk_zUZovoAznrsQAGQAaKzE3rDBX7jRv-kp_yYocbc=.23b90ac7-1412-4377-a3c3-f144a1a41c07@github.com> On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 19:11:56 GMT, Eric Caspole wrote: > Time to upgrade the JMH. Among the other benefits I know that perfasm works better on aarch64. This pull request has been closed without being integrated. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks/pull/13 From ecaspole at openjdk.org Tue Dec 13 17:01:27 2022 From: ecaspole at openjdk.org (Eric Caspole) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 17:01:27 GMT Subject: RFR: Switch project to jdk to permit JDK reviewers, not code-tools reviewers. Message-ID: Based on an internal discussion, we decided that having JDK reviewers is more appropriate for this project. ------------- Commit messages: - Switch project to jdk to permit JDK reviewers, not code-tools reviewers. Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks/pull/14/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks&pr=14&range=00 Stats: 1 line in 1 file changed: 0 ins; 0 del; 1 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks/pull/14.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks pull/14/head:pull/14 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks/pull/14 From duke at openjdk.org Tue Dec 13 17:26:00 2022 From: duke at openjdk.org (duke) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 17:26:00 GMT Subject: git: openjdk/jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks: Switch project to jdk to permit JDK reviewers, not code-tools reviewers. (#14) Message-ID: <45a4de5b-1516-41f3-8ffc-ba6bae8f89e6@openjdk.org> Changeset: f1d829b6 Author: Eric Caspole Committer: GitHub Date: 2022-12-13 12:25:39 +0000 URL: https://git.openjdk.org/jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks/commit/f1d829b6443778438d3eaab03e7dfa72764a7dcc Switch project to jdk to permit JDK reviewers, not code-tools reviewers. (#14) ! .jcheck/conf From ecaspole at openjdk.org Tue Dec 13 17:29:20 2022 From: ecaspole at openjdk.org (Eric Caspole) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 17:29:20 GMT Subject: Withdrawn: Switch project to jdk to permit JDK reviewers, not code-tools reviewers. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:53:47 GMT, Eric Caspole wrote: > Based on an internal discussion, we decided that having JDK reviewers is more appropriate for this project. This pull request has been closed without being integrated. ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks/pull/14 From eric.caspole at oracle.com Wed Dec 14 16:50:57 2022 From: eric.caspole at oracle.com (Eric Caspole) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 11:50:57 -0500 Subject: Switched the project of jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks to jdk Message-ID: <9b2b6a4f-d881-0308-bb21-8e58e4689989@oracle.com> Hi everyone, Based on internal discussions we have switched the "project" of jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks to "jdk" to allow jdk reviewers for the JMH micros, rather than code-tools reviewers, of which there are far fewer, and the jmh-jdk-microbenchmarks doesn't have any real relationship to anything else in code-tools. Regards, Eric