jmx-dev RFR 8034177: sun/management/jmxremote/startstop/JMXStartStopTest.java should report port in use
Daniel Fuchs
daniel.fuchs at oracle.com
Fri Feb 14 06:54:04 PST 2014
BTW - it occurs to me that it doesn't really matters which
process opens the ServerSocket - does it? So you might as
well create the server socket before calling jcmd() - can't
you?
-- daniel
On 2/14/14 3:43 PM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
> Hi Jaroslav,
>
> I agree with the idea, but the following logic looks suspect:
>
> 378 for(String arg : args) {
> 379 if (arg.startsWith("-")) {
> 380 pbArgs.add(0, arg); // VM arg
> 381 } else {
> 382 pbArgs.add(arg); // application arg
> 383 }
> 384 }
>
> it will inverse the orders of VM args in the sub process, and
> will have unpredictable results if any of those args accept
> parameters - such as '-cp <classpath>' which would result in
> <classpath> being taken as an application arg.
>
> It's difficult to say whether such a situation can or can't happen,
> but I suspect it would be safer to simply look for the "allocate_port"
> string or pass the "allocate_port" as a system property
> (e.g -Dallocate.port=true) - which would remove the need for that
> loop...
>
> best regards,
>
> -- daniel
>
> On 2/14/14 2:39 PM, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>> Please, review this test change.
>>
>> Issue : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8034177
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jbachorik/8034177/webrev.00
>>
>> The test is currently using a well-known SSH port 22 to make sure it is
>> not possible to start the management agent on this port. However, this
>> may fail when SSH server is not running on a test machine.
>>
>> The fix adds the possibility to to start up a dummy socket server in the
>> tested application and use the port from that socket server to make sure
>> that the management agent refuses to start on that port.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -JB-
>
More information about the jmx-dev
mailing list