jmx-dev : Should this list be archived?

[Adam Farley8]

Hehe, fair enough. :)

Best Regards

Adam Farley 
IBM Runtimes


Daniel Fuchs <daniel.fuchs at oracle.com> wrote on 07/05/2019 17:44:01:

> From: Daniel Fuchs <daniel.fuchs at oracle.com>
> To: Adam Farley8 <adam.farley at uk.ibm.com>, jmx-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Date: 07/05/2019 17:44
> Subject: Re: jmx-dev : Should this list be archived?
> 
> Hi Adam,
> 
> Sorry I should have replied to you earlier.
> 
> Most JMX-related discussions happen in serviceability-dev these
> days, and people who post here are usually redirected there.
> 
> I personally don't have any strong opposition in archiving
> this mailing list - but if it's going to cost me time I don't
> see any strong incentive to do it either ;-)
> 
> best regards,
> 
> -- daniel
> 
> On 07/05/2019 17:14, Adam Farley8 wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > Does anyone here think this list should/shouldn't be archived?
> > 
> > I mean that in a nice way, as I don't want to pursue archiving a list 
if 
> > people are still using it, or plan to.
> > 
> > More details on this list-archiving push here: 
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
> u=https-3A__bugs.openjdk.java.net_browse_JDK-2D8220662&d=DwIC-
> g&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=P5m8KWUXJf-
> CeVJc0hDGD9AQ2LkcXDC0PMV9ntVw5Ho&m=Dyaq-
> 
g5OkbW0m3KDBZTtQhUkRNsk115Ljm9SKQJaFFo&s=zJf8U2bgH7R4zTlOFamvwEOtYq_p_EqylwDFUMixPss&e=
> > 
> > List owners were contacted 3 weeks ago, and this is a follow-up for 
> > lists whose owners haven't replied yet.
> > 
> > Best Regards
> > 
> > Adam Farley
> > IBM Runtimes
> 
> 

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jmx-dev/attachments/20190508/9c4fbe8b/attachment.html>