Proposed schedule change for JSR 376

[mark.reinhold at oracle.com]

2015/12/3 7:27 -0800, peter.kriens at aqute.biz:
> I am not sure I understand why we need to delay the JSR 376? I think
> the delay is a great opportunity to deliver the JSR before, or at
> least aligned with the implementation so the EG can provide its input?

I expect the EG to provide input on a continuous basis, ahead of
each JCP milestone, not afterward.  At least that's how the process
is intended to work.

In terms of delivery, you can't deliver a JSR without a Reference
Implementation, so delivering the JSR earlier than the implementation
isn't really an option.

- Mark