Proposal: #NonHierarchicalLayers (+ #LayerPrimitives)
mark.reinhold at oracle.com
mark.reinhold at oracle.com
Wed Mar 8 22:31:45 UTC 2017
2017/3/8 13:22:32 -0800, tjwatson at us.ibm.com:
> mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote on 03/08/2017 02:07:39 PM:
>> ...
>>
>> I don't think it's unreasonable for an OSGi/JPMS interoperation solution
>> to have to do these things, especially when the alternative is to commit
>> the entire Java SE Platform to otherwise-unnecessary complexity for the
>> long term.
>
> If it was only for this limited case in the support of OSGi framework
> extensions then I tend to agree. I am under the impression that others
> have more general usecases for these methods. I am only giving feedback
> for my usecase to justify the need for the methods. There may be some
> ways around this for OSGi. I have to investigate to see how bad or
> difficult it makes life for us.
I appreciate all your feedback on OSGi so far. It'd be helpful to know
sooner, rather than later, whether you can work through these issues in
your proof-of-concept implementation.
- Mark
More information about the jpms-spec-experts
mailing list