Updated EA builds with initial implementations of current proposals

[Paul Benedict]

Hi Mark. Do these set of changes mean those alternative proposals are now
set in stone? I didn't know feedback was finished. For example, and I may
have missed this, but I can't recall one message in support of the
"requires static" syntax. As I said, I may have missed the supporters, but
I don't recall anyone championing that exact syntax. Almost everyone
objected to the use of "static" as a misleading use of the keyword.

On the other hand, if this is just a tentative change to move the feature
set along, that makes more sense. I just want to understand the
expectation. Thank you.

Cheers,
Paul

On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 6:13 PM, <mark.reinhold at oracle.com> wrote:

> FYI:
>
>   http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jigsaw-dev/2016-July/008467.html
>
> - Mark
>