JPMS Module Path question
Peter Kriens
peter.kriens at aqute.biz
Fri Jun 16 06:55:22 UTC 2017
In the current summary in http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jigsaw/spec/lang-vm.html (which I understand was pat of the input to the vote), the following things were wrong:
* Grammar (package declaration allowed together with a module declaration), and
* Several attribute descriptions were missing []
And of course the not so unimportant concepts like the UnnamedModule, AutomaticModule, enumerated, and read concepts are completely missing from the summary. Since I wrongly assumed the absence of these concepts in the summary was caused by them being runtime concepts and not JLS concepts I ignored them in the first article. However, the draft now shows they’ve become first class citizens, also for compiling. So I will create an update soon.
Just citing in the summary that it is out of date would have helped me a lot.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
> On 15 Jun 2017, at 20:54, Alex Buckley <alex.buckley at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> On 6/15/2017 7:51 AM, Peter Kriens wrote:
>> I agree with you that it is a useful document but I think it is very confusing that certain sections are now just wrong.
>
> Please identify a section that is "just wrong".
>
> Alex
More information about the jpms-spec-observers
mailing list