Draft JPMS Public Review specification

David M. Lloyd david.lloyd at redhat.com
Wed Mar 8 21:05:01 UTC 2017


Right now a Public Review definitely does not seem appropriate given 
that at least some of the EG still sees major problems with the draft, 
whereas it sends a message that there is consensus when there is not. 
Given the fact that there still are significant issues outstanding and 
disagreement within the EG, it seems likely to me that a at least a 
second Public Review would need to be submitted anyway, one way or 
another.  In this light, I think it makes sense to wait at least until 
there's some semblance of consensus among the EG before posting the 
public review.

On 03/07/2017 10:50 AM, mark.reinhold at oracle.com wrote:
> At this point in time the draft specification appears to achieve the goal
> of this JSR.  We have a small and shrinking number of open issues on the
> list [1], and I expect the resolution of those issues to require at most
> modest adjustments to the final draft.  I therefore intend to submit the
> following draft to the JCP PMO to be posted for Public Review:
>     http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/jigsaw/spec/
> Please let me know by 17:00 UTC next Tuesday, 14 March if you think any
> changes are required, or if you need more time for review.
> - Mark
> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/spec/issues


More information about the jpms-spec-observers mailing list