Another reminder: i18n strawman

[Stanley M. Ho]

Hi JSR 277 experts,

This is another reminder. If you still have inputs on the i18n strawman,
please send them in as soon as possible. In case you need more time to
review the strawman, please let me know. Otherwise, I would interpret the
silent to mean either you are fine with the strawman's content or your
concern has already been raised by other EG members. ;)

Thanks,
- Stanley


On Mon, 14 May 2007 14:54:43 -0700, Stanley M. Ho <Stanley.Ho at SUN.COM> wrote:

>Hi JSR 277 experts,
>
>This is a kindly reminder. If you have inputs on the i18n strawman,
>please send them in by 5/21/2007. Even if you have reviewed the strawman
>and have no comments, it would still be good to let us know.
>
>Thanks,
>- Stanley
>
>-------- Original Message --------
>Subject: Strawman: i18n support
>Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 17:09:41 -0700
>From: Stanley M. Ho <Stanley.Ho at Sun.COM>
>Reply-To: Java Community Process JSR #277 Expert List <JSR-277-EG at JCP.ORG>
>Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc.
>To: JSR-277-EG at JCP.ORG
>
>Hi JSR 277 experts,
>
>I've been working with Masayoshi Okutsu (i18n lead) and Naoto Sato in
>the Java SE team to come up with a strawman for the i18n support. This
>strawman was developed based on the initial i18n requirements we
>discussed in the EG several weeks ago, as well as on the assumption that
>we simply want to reuse the existing module distribution format (i.e.
>jam files) and repository infrastructure for packaging and deploying
>resources.
>
>I have uploaded the strawman [1] to the expert group home page for
>download. If you prefer to receive them in email, please let me know and
>I'll send it to you directly.
>
>I would like to get your inputs by 5/21/2007, so we can determine how to
>refine the strawman further.
>
>Thanks,
>- Stanley
>
>[1] i18n strawman
>http://www.jcp.org/en/eg/download/jsr-277-i18n-strawman-05022007.pdf?id=277&fileId=3417