RFR: CODETOOLS-7903317: Fix code to compile extra property definitions
Jonathan Gibbons
jjg at openjdk.org
Wed Sep 21 21:13:30 UTC 2022
On Mon, 19 Sep 2022 06:43:52 GMT, Daniel Jeliński <djelinski at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Please review a fairly simple update to eliminate false positives in comments when looking for the name of the class in a Java source file.
>>
>> The fix addresses a performance issue when running tests, because the "extra property definition" files were compiled every time jtreg was run, instead of as needed, which is the intent.
>>
>> The fix is to ignore comments in the source code. The code to do this is copied from equivalent functionality in the langtools `ToolBox` class, which has been in use for many years.
>>
>> The existing tests for "extra property definition" files have been extended with a test case to ensure that the false positives no longer occur and that the files are not recompiled unnecessarily.
>>
>> Minor style issues in the main source file have also been fixed.
>
> src/share/classes/com/sun/javatest/regtest/config/ExtraPropDefns.java line 227:
>
>> 225: if (needCompilation) {
>> 226: if (trace) {
>> 227: System.err.println("Compiling extra property definition files: " + javacArgs);
>
> Could you also log why the compilation was needed? i.e. when setting needCompilation, log sf and cf.
Will investigate, as a separate RFE
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jtreg/pull/122
More information about the jtreg-dev
mailing list