RFR: 7903785: Improve reporting for skipped tests [v2]
Christian Stein
cstein at openjdk.org
Thu Aug 29 06:58:30 UTC 2024
On Wed, 28 Aug 2024 19:46:17 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons <jjg at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I'll have to check your suggested change; my recollection is that all tests passed when run locally.
>
> The warnings are as expected when conditions are as found.
> I'll have to check your suggested change; my recollection is that all tests passed when run locally.
The `else` branch (`HEADLESS != 1`) also has an incremented `REPORT_EXPECT_PASS` value: from `93` to `94`.
Note that the merge with `upstream/master` still leads to the same error:
/bin/grep -s "Test results: passed: ${EXPECT_PASS}; failed: ${EXPECT_FAIL}; error: 88" /home/runner/work/jtreg/jtreg/build/test/ReportOnlyTest.jt.log > /dev/null
Expect: Test results: passed: 91; failed: 40; error: 88
make: *** [../test/basic/ReportOnlyTest.gmk:45: /home/runner/work/jtreg/jtreg/build/test/ReportOnlyTest.ok] Error 1
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jtreg/pull/217#discussion_r1735667634
More information about the jtreg-dev
mailing list