RFR: 7903785: Improve reporting for skipped tests [v2]

Christian Stein cstein at openjdk.org
Fri Sep 20 05:24:46 UTC 2024


On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 06:56:19 GMT, Christian Stein <cstein at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The warnings are as expected when conditions are as found.
>
>> I'll have to check your suggested change; my recollection is that all tests passed when run locally.
> 
> The `else` branch (`HEADLESS != 1`) also has an incremented `REPORT_EXPECT_PASS` value: from `93`  to `94`.
> 
> Note that the merge with `upstream/master` still leads to the same error:
> 
> /bin/grep -s "Test results: passed: ${EXPECT_PASS}; failed: ${EXPECT_FAIL}; error: 88" /home/runner/work/jtreg/jtreg/build/test/ReportOnlyTest.jt.log  > /dev/null
> Expect: Test results: passed: 91; failed: 40; error: 88
> make: *** [../test/basic/ReportOnlyTest.gmk:45: /home/runner/work/jtreg/jtreg/build/test/ReportOnlyTest.ok] Error 1

Fixed via https://github.com/openjdk/jtreg/pull/217/commits/5c990293d97e15d4b292052210f977338640df74

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jtreg/pull/217#discussion_r1767998327


More information about the jtreg-dev mailing list