On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:47, Jonathan Gibbons <Jonathan.Gibbons at sun.com> wrote: > Egads, 'twould appear t'be true. > > As a workaround, I suggest you use the -ignore switch (e.g. -ignore:quiet) > instead of -k:\!ignore. I tried -ignore:quiet, but that appears to have the same bug; that is, it is not a workaround. Martin