Status of jtreg build

Jonathan Gibbons jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com
Tue Jun 14 15:53:41 UTC 2016


I'll add some explanatory text re: location of binaries.

I'll add more text about versions.  It takes "process" to 
use/test/support newer versions, so my intent is to document the version 
being used in Oracle JDK org; others are free to use/try newer versions, 
and to report any issues they may encounter when using other versions.

-- Jon

On 06/11/2016 09:33 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> Thanks, Jonathan,
>
> testng.org <http://testng.org> no longer tries to be a direct source 
> of binary artifacts.
> You might point them at
> http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.beust/jcommander
> http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.testng/testng
>
> Looking at the Usages column at 
> http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.testng/testng, I would guess 
> 6.9.6 was a bug fix release for 6.9.5.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Jonathan Gibbons 
> <jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com <mailto:jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>     Martin, Volker, jtreg builders,
>
>     I've updated jtreg so that it can take testng-*.jar and
>     jcommander-*.jar as found
>     on Maven.
>
>     Updated instructions are in
>     * make/Defs.gmk (if you use make)
>     * make/build.properties (if you use Ant)
>
>     https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/CODETOOLS-7901669
>
>     -- Jon
>
>
>     On 04/13/2016 08:26 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>
>         Maven likes to have as many jar files as possible, so
>         jcommander and
>         testng are separated.
>         But jtreg thinks testng.jar should contain jcommander, so I
>         ended up
>         having to build testng-jar-all
>
>         (jtreg should probably switch to maven's view of the world and
>         take
>         jcommander as another dependency)
>
>         Hacky build script snippet:
>
>         # --- testng ---
>         # Build "fat" testng.jar (incorporating jcommander) from source.
>         # No one seems to distribute such fat testng jars anymore.
>         rm -rf testng testng-*
>         wget -qOtestng.zip
>         https://github.com/cbeust/testng/archive/testng-6.8.5.zip
>         unzip -q testng.zip
>         rm testng.zip
>         mv testng-* testng
>         (
>            export JAVA_HOME="$HOME/jdk/jdk6"
>            export PATH=$JAVA_HOME/bin:$PATH
>            cd testng &&
>            mkdir -p ~/.ant/lib &&
>            cp ivy-2.1.0.jar ~/.ant/lib/. &&
>            ant clean compile copy-resources testng-jar-all &&
>            rm ~/.ant/lib/ivy-2.1.0.jar
>         )
>         TESTNG_HOME="$ROOT/testng"
>         TESTNG_JAR=$(find "$ROOT/testng/target/" -name "testng*jar")
>
>         On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Volker Simonis
>         <volker.simonis at gmail.com <mailto:volker.simonis at gmail.com>>
>         wrote:
>
>
>             On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:28 PM, Martin Buchholz
>             <martinrb at google.com <mailto:martinrb at google.com>>
>             wrote:
>
>                 jtreg build on
>                 https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/
>                 is broken, as is its dependency asmtools
>                 The jtreg-4.2 build they advertise was created before
>                 there was any 4.2
>                 tag.
>                 They seem to be missing testng as a dependency.
>                 The project does keep trying (and failing) to build,
>                 however.
>
>                 I tried and failed to find on the Net the "full"
>                 testng-6.8.zip that
>                 used to be distributed on testng.org <http://testng.org>.
>
>             That seems true, but I think all you needed from the
>             "full" testng-6.8.zip
>             was the LICENSE file. See jtreg/make/jtreg.gmk
>
>             $(JTREG_IMAGEDIR)/legal/testng/LICENSE.txt: $(call
>             PosixPath,$(TESTNG_HOME)/LICENSE.txt)
>                      $(MKDIR) -p $(@D)
>                      $(CAT) $(TESTNG_HOME)/LICENSE.txt >> $@
>
>             The testng jar file is specified by TESTNG_JAR anyway. So
>             I think you can
>             download the jar from
>
>             http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.testng/testng/6.8 or
>             http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.testng/testng/6.8.5
>
>             because http://openjdk.java.net/jtreg/build.html now
>             recommends 6.8.5 and
>             get the license file from:
>
>             https://github.com/cbeust/testng
>
>                 On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Jonathan Gibbons
>                 <jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com
>                 <mailto:jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>
>                     On 04/11/2016 11:06 AM, Carsten Varming wrote:
>
>                         Dear jtreg devs,
>
>                         I wanted to download jtreg to run JDK9 hotspot
>                         regression tests, but I
>                         have been unsuccessful so far. Perhaps you
>                         know what I need to do to
>                         get
>                         going.
>
>                         The hotspot regression tests need at least
>                         jtreg 4.2 b01. When I
>                         downloaded the latest build published at
>                         https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jtreg/
>                         (4.2.0-tip, from
>                         build
>                         496) and tried the hotspot regression tests I got:
>
>                         Error: Unexpected exception occurred!
>                         java.lang.NumberFormatException:
>                         For
>                         input string: "ip"
>                         java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input
>                         string: "ip"
>                                  at
>
>                         java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(java.base at 9-internal/NumberFormatException.java:65)
>                                  at
>                         java.lang.Integer.parseInt(java.base at 9-internal/Integer.java:695)
>                                  at
>                         java.lang.Integer.parseInt(java.base at 9-internal/Integer.java:813)
>                                  at
>                         com.sun.javatest.regtest.Version.getBuild(Version.java:186)
>                                  at
>                         com.sun.javatest.regtest.Version.compareTo(Version.java:168)
>                                  at
>                         com.sun.javatest.regtest.Main.run(Main.java:1091)
>                                  at
>                         com.sun.javatest.regtest.Main.run(Main.java:1037)
>                                  at
>                         com.sun.javatest.regtest.Main.main(Main.java:951)
>
>                         I suspect the check against
>                         "requiredVersion=4.2 b01" from TEST.ROOT
>
>                         (http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/hs-rt/hotspot/file/1c08ca66db33/test/TEST.ROOT)
>                         went wrong. I suspect "build =
>                         manifest.getProperty("jtreg-Build");" in
>
>                         http://hg.openjdk.java.net/code-tools/jtreg/file/6bfef17a03d5/src/share/classes/com/sun/javatest/regtest/Version.java
>                         sets Version.build to "tip" and
>                         Version.getBuild tries to parse "ip" as
>                         a
>                         number. :(
>
>                         I tried to get past this problem by changing
>                         the required jtreg version
>                         to
>                         4.1 b01. That gets the tests running, but a
>                         third of them fail with a
>                         class
>                         loading problem: A ClassFormatError is thrown
>                         with "Truncated class
>                         file".
>                         This seems to be due to a missing
>                         java/lang/reflect/JTRegModuleHelper.class.
>                         I suspect that this requirement was introduced
>                         with the module system
>                         that
>                         was integrated a few weeks ago.
>
>                         So, how do I get a version of jtreg that works
>                         with the latest JDK9?
>
>                         BTW. It looks like the jtreg build
>                         (https://adopt-openjdk.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jtreg/)
>                         is failing because
>                         of a
>                         missing dependency on testng.
>
>                         Help much appreaciated,
>                         Carsten
>
>
>                     The version of jtreg available on cloudbees.com
>                     <http://cloudbees.com> has the following entry
>                     in
>                     its MANIFEST.MF,
>
>                          jtreg-Build: tip
>
>                     and jtreg is naively assuming it to be of the form
>                          jtreg-Build: b<integer>
>
>                     I can make jtreg be more tolerant, but I also also
>                     note that the binary
>                     is
>                     missing lib/asmtools.jar, which is required by
>                     some tests.  The contents
>                     of
>                     the tar bundle are all dated 25 January 2016,
>                     10:47 which is somewhat
>                     suspicious.
>
>                     -- Jon
>
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jtreg-use/attachments/20160614/63be0139/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the jtreg-use mailing list