Bugs

[andrei.eremeev]

Yes, thank you. The root cause of the problem is using labels in such way:
    a : { for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) { break a;} }

Andrei Eremeev

On 02/02/2015 08:21 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
> On 02/02/2015 07:33 AM, andrei.eremeev wrote:
>> Hi REPL team,
>>
>> New REPL bugs related to completion analysis:
>> 1. assert true // Expected COMPLETE_WITH_SEMI, got COMPLETE.
>>
>> 2. switch (ch) case a: break; // Expected COMPLETE_WITH_SEMI, got 
>> UNKNOWN.
>> "break" breaks the code.
>
> Andrei,
>
> Did you really mean what you typed in the example, with no '{' ?
> Doesn't seem like COMPLETE_WITH_SEMI to me.
>
> -- Jon
>
>>
>> 3. Statements without braces fail.
>> for(Object o : a) a; // expected [COMPLETE] but found [UNKNOWN]
>> As well as If constructions.
>>
>> 4. int path[], status: expected [COMPLETE_WITH_SEMI], but found 
>> [DEFINITELY_INCOMPLETE]
>>
>> Andrei Eremeev
>