Kulla binaries: missing native library

[Andrei Eremeev]

It must be true. If you try to run Kulla with JDK older than 9, you will 
get a error "run with JDK9...".

Andrei

On 23.07.2015 11:50, Eugene Zhuravlev wrote:
> Thanks a lot Jan,
> It works fine with b73.
>
> Am I right that Kulla won't run with older JDK versions (e.g. java 8)?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Eugene Zhuravlev
> Software Developer
> JetBrains
> http://www.jetbrains.com
> "Develop with pleasure!"
>
> On 22-Jul-15 10:27 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> Hello Eugene,
>>
>> Could you please try JDK 9 b73? The kulla-0.710-20150722005843.jar
>> should work with that.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>      Jan
>>
>> On 22.7.2015 19:06, Eugene Zhuravlev wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I was trying to launch Kulla console using binaries downloaded from the
>>> OpenJDK Cloudbees Build farm, but it fails to start because native
>>> library "ne" cannot be found:
>>>
>>> C:\java\kulla>C:\java\jdk190\bin\java -jar 
>>> kulla-0.710-20150722005843.jar
>>> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no le in
>>> java.library.path
>>>          at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1860)
>>>          at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:874)
>>>          at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:1111)
>>>          at jdk.internal.jline.WindowsTerminal.<clinit>
>>>
>>> Neither kulla-0.710-20150722005843.jar nor JDK9 build I have (build
>>> 1.9.0-ea-b72) does not include this native library.
>>>
>>> So my questions are:
>>> 1. Is Kulla available as a separate distribution that can be used with
>>> currently released JDK versions (e.g. java 8)?
>>> 2. Is it possible to get a binary java distribution for windows that is
>>> runnable with latest officially available JDK9 builds or I need to 
>>> build
>>> a dedicated jdk9 distribution that includes Kulla?
>>>
>>> Thank you in advance for any help on this.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> !DSPAM:7,55affcaa211611380419189!
>>