JShell/Kulla towards JDK9 and Fix Version

[andrei.eremeev]

I created the tracking task and assigned it to me. BTW, what is the 
deadline of integration?

Now I see problems. What if we have a testng test with several test 
cases and one of the test cases fails. This test should be excluded, but 
the whole test won't be run, because of a minor bug. So we will lose 
some tests until the bug is not fixed. Does jtreg support exclusion of a 
test case?

Andrei Eremeev

On 06/21/2015 02:17 AM, Robert Field wrote:
>
> On 06/20/15 10:47, Andrei Eremeev wrote:
>> Noted!
>>
>> Before integrating Kulla to JDK9 all excluded tests for JShell should 
>> be cleaned up:
>> 1. Now if a test is excluded, it has "@Test(enabled = false)" 
>> annotation, so jtreg does not indicate nothing. Instead of using the 
>> annotation, "@ignore" jtreg tag should be used. In this case, we 
>> won't miss that a test will never be run.
>> 2. Each of the excluded tests should have an open bug in JBS. The bug 
>> id should be written in "@ignore" tag.
>
> Sounds good.  Are you signed up for that task?  Would you like a bug 
> assigned to you for it?
>
> Thanks,
> Robert
>
>>
>> Andrei Eremeev
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: robert.field at oracle.com
>> To: kulla-dev at openjdk.java.net
>> Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 4:12:14 AM GMT +03:00 Iraq
>> Subject: JShell/Kulla towards JDK9 and Fix Version
>>
>> We believe the core work of JShell is done, that the functionality is
>> there and fairly stable, and yes sure there are bugs to fix, but they
>> are not too glaring.  What that means is it is time to work towards
>> moving JShell into the JDK9 main-line repo!
>>
>> This also has an effect on what Fix Version we use.  Work that we need
>> to do before it goes into JDK9 (e.g., API docs clean-up) or, because of
>> timing, we know will go into the Kulla repo should continue to use the
>> 9-repo-kulla Fix Version.  Everything else, including almost all bug
>> reports, should have Fix Version: 9.
>>
>> -Robert
>>
>