JShell: source in langtools vs JDK?
Robert Field
robert.field at oracle.com
Thu Sep 17 16:28:22 UTC 2015
On 09/17/15 09:25, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
>
>
> On 17/09/15 16:59, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> In the short term, would it help those folk actively working on the
>> kulla code base to have recent full builds of the kulla forest
>> available from somewhere (i.e, with jline and jdi present), so that
>> we can minimize any short term inconvenience until kulla is integrated?
> I don't think that would help; note that the issues I pointed out in
> my writeup essentially boils down to the fact that part of the jshell
> environment (the remote agent) is insensitive to whatever parameter
> you pass on the command line when you run jshell/run tests (this is
> problem #3 in my email). As a consequence, you will be rnning some
> weird two headed beast which has some bits coming from the jshell
> under development, while other bits will fall back to the jshell
> version available in the 'recent build' (which presumably doesn't
> contain the fix/enhancement the dev is working on).
That seems a bug that needs to be addressed rather than a factor in the
location of the source.
-Robert
>
> I somewhat agree that #1 and #2 *should* go away in the long run when
> modules will be fully supported; that is, assuming that -override will
> do the right thing and not (as currently with -Xbootclasspath) omit
> all classes in same package available in jimage but not in the
> overriding module (problem #1).
>
> Maurizio
More information about the kulla-dev
mailing list