JShell: source in langtools vs JDK?

Robert Field robert.field at oracle.com
Thu Sep 17 16:28:22 UTC 2015


On 09/17/15 09:25, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
>
>
> On 17/09/15 16:59, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> In the short term, would it help those folk actively working on the 
>> kulla code base to have recent full builds of the kulla forest 
>> available from somewhere (i.e, with jline and jdi present), so that 
>> we can minimize any short term inconvenience until kulla is integrated?
> I don't think that would help; note that the issues I pointed out in 
> my writeup essentially boils down to the fact that part of the jshell 
> environment (the remote agent) is insensitive to whatever parameter 
> you pass on the command line when you run jshell/run tests (this is 
> problem #3 in my email). As a consequence, you will be rnning some 
> weird two headed beast which has some bits coming from the jshell 
> under development, while other bits will fall back to the jshell 
> version available in the 'recent build' (which presumably doesn't 
> contain the fix/enhancement the dev is working on).

That seems a bug that needs to be addressed rather than a factor in the 
location of the source.

-Robert

>
> I somewhat agree that #1 and #2 *should* go away in the long run when 
> modules will be fully supported; that is, assuming that -override will 
> do the right thing and not (as currently with -Xbootclasspath) omit 
> all classes in same package available in jimage but not in the 
> overriding module (problem #1).
>
> Maurizio



More information about the kulla-dev mailing list