Method calls vs lambda calls

[Joshua Bloch]

I think that perhaps some explicit syntax should be required when invoking a
function object.  That would prevent this sort of confusion.

         Josh

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Stefan Schulz <schulz at the-loom.de> wrote:

> You're right, of course.
> Same as with instance and local variables.
>
> Am 14.12.2009 21:37, schrieb Neal Gafter:
> > I'd expect the latter to shadow the former (it is in a nested scope, not
> > the same scope).
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Stefan Schulz <schulz at the-loom.de
> > <mailto:schulz at the-loom.de>> wrote:
> >
> >     Am 14.12.2009 21:07, schrieb Alex Blewitt:
> >      > public class Example {
> >      >     public int fortyTwo() {
> >      >       return 6*9;
> >      >     }
> >      >     public void run() {
> >      >       System.out.println(fortyTwo())
> >      >       #int() fortyTwo = #int() { return 42; }
> >      >       System.out.println(fortyTwo())
> >      >     }
> >      > }
> >      >
> >      > What's the result on the output here?
> >
> >     I'd suspect a compile error due to defining two "methods" having the
> >     same signature in the same scope.
> >
> >
>
>