hg: lambda/lambda/langtools: Bug fixes:

[Brian Goetz]

I say no.  This is a Zero Abstract Method (ZAM) type :)


On 8/19/2010 9:00 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
> On 08/19/10, maurizio.cimadamore at oracle.com wrote:
>> Changeset: ce46b6012362
>> Author:    mcimadamore
>> Date:      2010-08-19 13:11 +0100
>> URL:       http://hg.openjdk.java.net/lambda/lambda/langtools/rev/ce46b6012362
>>
>> Bug fixes:
>> *) check that the compiler emits meaningful diagnostics when the lambda body contains bad statements
>> *) the routine that checks for SAM types should skip defender methods in extended interfaces
>
> I don't know, but should this extended interface be considered a SAM type or not?
>
> public interface UncleSam {
>    extension BigDecimal calculateTaxes(String taxPayerId) default Tax.calc;
> }
>
> Regards, Peter
>
>
>> *) failure of regression test CheckExamples.java depending on localization settings
>>
>> ! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/code/Types.java
>> ! src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/parser/JavacParser.java
>> ! test/tools/javac/diags/examples/IllegalChar.java
>> + test/tools/javac/lambda/BadStatementInLambda.java
>> + test/tools/javac/lambda/BadStatementInLambda.out
>> + test/tools/javac/lambda/Defender01.java
>>
>>
>>
>